This article was originally written by Karla Phillips-Krivickas and published by ExcelinEd in Action on December 7, 2022.
“No food or drinks past this point.” My daughter proudly read this sign before almost walking onto the basketball court with her soda. At first glance, this might not seem very impressive for an eighth grader, but most people wouldn’t believe it was possible for a student with a cognitive disability. In fact, in the delivery room, one of the first things my doctor said about my daughter was that she may never be able to read. Yet today my beautiful eighth grader exemplifies why making literacy the goal for all students should be non-negotiable—even if it takes a student longer than the usual three grades to master the skill.
In 2002, Governor Jeb Bush led Florida to launch a groundbreaking K-3 reading program Just Read, Florida! When third-grade reading scores soared in the Sunshine State, other states noticed. Today, six states, including my home state of Arizona, are using similar comprehensive policies to address their early literacy crises and ensure students are reading on grade level by the end of third grade.
These statewide programs combine supports and early interventions to address students’ specific reading needs and ensure third-grade students demonstrate sufficient reading skills before they are promoted to fourth grade. When policymakers designed these programs, they included a sensible exemption from retention for students with disabilities if a student’s individualized education program (IEP) team decides that promotion is appropriate. Now—twenty years later—it’s time for states to explicitly analyze how students with disabilities have fared, including how the pandemic has affected these students.
In the decade before the pandemic, reading achievement for students with disabilities actually declined across the nation, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). And we know these students were disproportionately impacted by school shutdowns.
A few states, including Arizona and Mississippi, defied this national trend and experienced an increase in reading achievement for students with disabilities. These states show what is possible when states see all students as future readers. Now is the time for states to strengthen comprehensive reading programs by ensuring students with disabilities are intentionally and explicitly included. Here are some common sense recommendations states can consider as they work to empower each student to read.
- Ensure all assessments and tools are fully accessible. Federal law already requires this, but as states continue to lean into the use of reading assessments and screeners, states can take steps to facilitate compliance. For example, many states require that their state department of education or state board develop either approved or recommended assessments. Only those that can certify accessibility should be included. States could also embed demonstration of assessment accessibility into school or district literacy plans or grant applications. While the federal requirement for accessibility also applies to students with significant cognitive disabilities, a recent report details the lack of available alternate interim assessments. The report found that none of the 14 commercially available interim assessments offered an alternate assessment option for students with significant intellectual disabilities.
- Examine the data by disability category. Disaggregate state-level reading data to not just include special education as a subgroup but to include the specific thirteen disability categories. Students receiving special education services are not a monolithic group. In fact, there is great diversity. The literacy needs of a student with a visual impairment, for example, is vastly different from a student with a hearing impairment. A deep data dive will demonstrate this and prompt productive policy conversations to develop strategic programmatic solutions. In particular, any post-COVID impact analysis should incorporate this level of data disaggregation.
- Analyze the long-term outcomes for students who have been exempted from retention. Who are they, and why were they granted exceptions? Did they make growth in their reading achievement? If so, for how long? Reading by the end of third grade is a critical milestone. Children who are not reading proficiently by then are four times more likely to drop out or fail to graduate from high school, according to a report by the Annie E. Casey Foundation. But for some students, learning to read can be a basic safety measure let alone a critical life skill, and it may take longer for some to master the skill. We shouldn’t rest until all students can read.
- Connect literacy goals across all programs and divisions in the state. Improving reading achievement is a critical component of the work being done under federal programs for English learners, students with disabilities, and school improvement efforts. This work often happens in silos, yet it shouldn’t. Policymakers should strive to weave these efforts together to maximize schools’ time and resources and to ensure there are no duplicative requests.
Pandemic or not, reading is a fundamental skill students need to learn, graduate, succeed and navigate the world safely. For some students with disabilities, learning to read may take more time than other students. But it is no less critical. Comprehensive state literacy programs are making great progress toward equipping all students to read by the end of third grade. And if we continue refining these programs, we will reach our goal of seeing all students reach their greatest literacy potential.